October 22, 2009
Since finishing my corded stay (which ended up being not corded!) I decided to go into making a gown to wear over it right away rather than working on additional sets of undergarments. That way I can refine the fit and once I have a good basic bodice pattern to work from I can pretty much create limitless variations!
That being decided, I had a terribly hard time deciding what would be a good basic pattern to start with. There are so many styles in the 1820's that you can go with. Round high necklines, shallower necklines, wide scoop necklines, squared necklines, gathered necklines, V shaped necklines both steep and shallow. . .so it was difficult deciding on an overall representative style.
In the end, I chose this.
The sketch is bad, but it was a quicky drawing after a whole morning of laborious thought for me to go off of and reference as I made my pattern and mock ups. It has a shallow scoop neckline because that is an oft seen style in the 20's and is also more flattering to me than other styles. It has a front opening because I need nursing access and I didn't want to make a seperate nursing panel. (Most dresses from this period I have seen pictures of open in the back). The lining will be darted to fit and the outer layer will be gathered over the fitted lining. It has moderate size gigot sleeves. (Is there a different name for moderate size gigot sleeves??) I don't need huge sleeves and besides taking more fabric I think the bigger sleeves look ridiculous! I am comfortable with this size but would not go any bigger. At least theoretically on paper. It will have a waistband which will open to a dogleg closure and the skirt will be 3 panels of fabric gathered or gauged to the waistband. The skirt hem is to end just above the ankle, a good "active style" length.

To start with, I tried on my 1820's style dress from last year over my stays to see if I would have to make adjustments to the pattern. I decided I wanted a slightly lower waistline (last years dress was made to go over short stays) and I needed a tad extra width across the bust. I also wanted curved back seams instead of the more straight diagonal seams I used last year. Curved seams are just prettier. :) I made the modifications to my paper pattern and traced it out new. I went through 3 mockups before getting the fit I wanted. I had to lengthen the waistline, try on the mock up, pleat the front excess at the waist, tie an elastic cord around my waist where I wanted the waistline to sit, mark it on the mock up (while it was on me. That was interesting.) I also had to refine the armscye curve and take some excess fabric out of the shoulder seam. I measured my arm and using the Sense and Sensibility Spencer pattern and Janet Arnold as a guide, made a draft for my sleeve. Once all that was done I ended up with these pieces: (my main pattern pieces are for a round high neckline. It is much easier for me to cut a new shallower neckline if desired than to raise a shallow neckline to a high one if I need to).

I ran into a snag with the sleeves. I didn't have quite enough yardage left to cut both sleeves on the fold. I at last decided to fold each selvedge edge in to the center line of the fabric width. Then I placed the sleeve on the fold. Part of the sleeve head did not fit, so I folded it out of the way and cut out what I could.


Then, I cut out lining pieces for the bodice from strong white cotton. I don't know if I will line the sleeves or not but I think not. . .they are so large anyway (compared to what I normally make) I think extra fabric would end up weighing them down. On the other hand, something light yet firm would help give the sleeves more shape, especially in the head. But I don't have anything light and firm like that so for now, I think I will leave the sleeves unlined.
Finally, I cut out the new, shallower neckline on all the bodice front and back pieces.

Love,
Sarah
October 23, 2009
Yesterday afternoon I was able to start sewing the bodice together and was able to get all the main pieces put together and the piping added around the neckline for a finish. I piped each seam on the bodice; the back to side back seams, the side to front seams, and the shoulder seams. I use Peaches n' Cream cotton cord for my piping. For some reason the piping on my last years 1820's dress looks huge to me now. My goal is to get as teeny a pipe as I can. On the few original garments I've actually seen in person, the piping was so small as to be astonishing. It looked almost like a teeny bitty fold of fabric, so much different than the modern day clunky chunky piping you can buy pre made at the fabric store!
So anyway, I piped the bodice. I piped down the center front openings because it gives added strength to that area and on some original gowns with 2 piece fronts (even though they open in the back) the center seam is piped. I like piping; it gives such a neat clean finish and is so quick to do. I turned the raw edges of the piping under and slip stitched them to the dress lining to finish everything off.



I then turned my attention to the sleeves. I was pretty excited about them since last year I tried to make this sleeve style and it failed since I did not give myself enough length in the sleeve head. This time, I made sure to add plenty of length! :) Since the sleeve is fitted at the wrist I wanted a short placket so I could easily get my hand through. I sewed piping to the sleeve down the seam on one side, across the bottom and up a few inches on the other side, tapering the piping out to the raw edge. Then, when I sewed the sleeve seam I stopped the stitch line just below where I stopped the piping. The sleeves were turned inside out and the raw edges of the piping turned under and pinned to the lining along the bottom of the sleeve and up the sides of the short placket. A tidy way to do a placket and hem, all at once, and very fast and easy. I will sew a hook and eye to the wrists when I finish the dress.


Sarah ~ who is starting to have a most terrible and untimely fascination with 1810's fashions instead of the 1820's. . .
October 25, 2009
Yesterday I had a little time in the morning to work on the dress so I sewed in the sleeves, trimmed the allowance and considered it good. On historical dresses, many times the sleeve seam does not match the side seam like modern garments. The sleeve seam often is meant to run down the inside of the arm so it is matched to a place on the front bodice, usually at or just below the bust line. I don't have a set, mathematical method for positioning the sleeve seam. What I do is put on the sleeveless bodice, pin it shut, and pull up the sleeve on my arm. I adjust it til I like how it looks and where the seam lies and then I mark the position of the sleeve seam with a pin, on the front bodice. Then when I go to sew the sleeve in I just match the seam to the pin-point.
I don't know what kind of seam finishes were commonly used for dresses of the 1820's. It seems in pictures of original dresses the seams of sturdy fabric are left raw. Since my fabric is pretty sturdy, I just left the seams raw as well. For my 1860's style dresses I know seams were often not finished and if they were, a largish overcast stitch was used or, for underwear, the seams could be run and fell. Sometimes seam binding was used. I like ease, so I just left the seams raw. Later, if I notice them fraying a lot (on past dresses I've made this way the seams just soften up with washing) I can overcast them by hand.
Once the sleeves were in I decided to work on the skirt. I seamed the 3 panels of fabric together, using the selvedge edge in the skirt seams as a natural seam finish. One of the seams I left open for a few inches at the top. I turned under, pressed and handstitched the allowances on each side to finish off the placket.
Then, to make the dogleg closure, I sewed an extended waistband onto one side of the waistband. This band extends 5.5" from the bodice front edge. On the opposite bodice front edge, I marked 5" from the center front.
I gathered the skirt panels by machine (2 rows of the biggest stitch my machine makes) and drew up the panels. I started pinning the skirt to the bodice along the extended waistband, making sure the waistband extended 1/2" from the finished placket edge of the skirt. I pinned the skirt all around, stopping at the point 5" from the edge of the opposite bodice front. This is how it looked once it was sewn to the bodice:




Love,
Sarah
October 28, 2009
It's been a few days since I've posted, but a few days ago I finished the hem. The hem was done in this manner:
3 strips of white cotton about 4" wide were torn full width and sewn together into a tube, equaling the circumference of the skirt. The white cotton facing was sewn to the skirt, right sides together, all along the bottom edge of the skirt. The seam was pressed towards the facing and 1/4" was turned under along the raw facing edge, towards the inside:


I still have to sew hooks to the bodice (I already sewed them to the dogleg closure) but I need 10 and only have 5 on hand so I need to pick up some more packages of them. I won't be going to town until tomorrow, but perhaps I can take some hooks off an old dress so I can finally wear this one.
Love,
Sarah
December 4, 2009
I have had this dress finished for over a month but have procrastinated posting pictures of it here until now. These were taken at the beginning of November outside of our house; the last warm days of fall! Now that it is finished I think it looks more late 1820's/early 1830's due to the height of the waist, the full skirts and the size of the sleeves. It's still an 1820's dress, just not as early a style as I had originally been going for. :) But I really like it anyway, I think it is my new favorite gown.



