Thursday, May 19, 2011

Harbinger of Spring

type='html'>Photobucket

Growing up, eating artichokes meant simmering them until tender and serving them with a dip of mayonnaise mixed with a bit of soy sauce. Had we been hip to it at the time, we might have called it a soy aioli, but to us it was just the perfect creamy salty accompaniment to those boiled leaves and still, to this day, I can’t eat artichoke leaves without it. Luckily, my artichoke repertoire has expanded ever so slightly beyond boiled leaves.

At FCI we prepare artichokes by ‘turning’ them, or removing all the outer leaves and using a paring knife to remove the green skin until you’re left with the tender heart of the artichoke. Once you have the heart, you can braise, roast, grill or do just about anything you want with it. Currently, in the restaurant at FCI, we serve slivers of braised artichoke heart with a roasted rack of lamb. They are delicious.

One of the perks of working on set at a cooking show is the opportunity to bring home the occasional excess produce. Once the segment is complete, the produce that was used to dress the set is usually still perfectly good, but won’t be visually appealing if saved for another shoot on another day. After the crew has been fed and talent takes what they want, the rest is up for grabs. I am very lucky to be working on these shows as the spring season rolls in and great produce such as asparagus, dandelion greens, spring onions, and of course artichokes, are the topic du jour. I made off with a few artichokes last week and while I was craving my mother’s simmered artichoke with ‘soy aioli’ I decided to broaden my artichoke horizon a bit more and see what I could come up with.

Enter Plenty, the new cookbook from Yotam Ottolenghi. I won’t say much about the book today, because I am smitten with the recipes and have a feeling that you may be hearing a lot about it over the coming weeks. Just know this: If you’re looking for some inspiration in the vegetable department, you are sure to find it in this book. I found mine when a relish of fava beans jumped off the page at me via some gorgeous photography. Favas are my ultimate harbinger of spring and they seemed the perfect accompaniment to the artichokes I had waiting. And a little hint about that other accompaniment I love so much? Hold on to the leaves you remove from the artichoke. Simmered over low heat they go very nicely with a little soy aioli.

I am providing the recipe here as Ottolenghi wrote it, but I was out of panko so I used a mix of walnut flour and whole wheat flour to bread the artichoke hearts. Use whatever, even plain old flour works well too.

Globe Artichokes with Crushed Fava Beans
Adapted from Plenty by Yotam Ottolenghi

1 3/4 cups shelled fava beans
1 small garlic clove, crushed
4 T extra-virgin olive oil plus more for frying
Freshly ground black pepper
1½ t Maldon sea salt
2-3 globe artichokes
3 lemons
1 egg, beaten
3 T panko
3 T fresh mint, chopped
2 T fresh dill, chopped

Bring a pan of water to a boil, add the beans and blanch for three minutes. Drain, refresh and leave in a colander to dry. Remove the outer skins by pressing each bean gently between your thumb and forefinger. Put the shelled beans in the bowl of a food processor. Add the garlic, four tablespoons of oil, some black pepper and half a teaspoon of salt, then pulse until just roughly chopped – don’t overdo it.

Cut off most of the stalk from the artichokes and pull off the tough outer leaves. Once you reach the softer, pale leaves, trim off the top, so you're left with the heart and some very soft leaves around it. Scrape off any remaining tough leaves and the 'hairs' in the center. Rub with a cut lemon to keep the artichokes from turning brown.

Bring a pan of water to a boil, drop in the artichokes and simmer until a knife cuts easily through the flesh, seven to 10 minutes. Drain and dry on paper towels. Put the artichokes in a bowl with the beaten egg, mix, then lift them into a bowl filled with the panko and 1/2 a teaspoon of salt, and coat them well.

Add enough oil to a pan to come 1 1/4 inches up the side. Heat until almost smoking. Fry the artichokes until golden, for about four minutes, turning them as you go. Transfer to a plate lined with paper towels and sprinkle with salt.

Put the fava bean mixture in a bowl and stir in the chopped herbs and the juice of a lemon. Spoon some of this over each serving plate, top with an artichoke heart and spoon more of the beans on top. Finish with a drizzle of olive oil and serve with a lemon wedge, if desired.

Ride for the Feast Chili Cookoff this Sunday

type='html'>Been buried under a mountain of real work so I haven't had much time to focus on snarky food posts and combing the police blotter for info on who killed who over an under-baked sweet potato.

But I did want to pop in for a quick post about this weekend's upcoming Chili Cookoff here in Baltimore.

On Sunday, February 27th, east Baltimore will be host to an exciting chili showdown – the 2011 Ride For The Feast Chili Cook-Off! The Cook-Off is organized by the Ride For The Feast, a 2-day, 140-mile bike ride that supports Moveable Feast, a nonprofit dedicated to feeding homebound Marylanders with life-threatening conditions.

Join a chili-loving crowd as they congregate at the Moveable Feast kitchens, located at 901 N. Milton Ave, Baltimore MD 21205. Ride for the Feast riders and volunteers will team up and compete to have the best chili at the competition! Winners will be decided by both popular opinion as well as a judging panel. The event will also feature a raffle of a fabulous (secret) prize!

Last year, charisma & culinary creativity were key factors in winning the crowd's approval. Hundreds of dollars were raised to benefit the Ride for the Feast. It is a great opportunity to enjoy some homemade, unique chili recipes, meet new people, and support a good cause.

The Chili Cook-Off will be held on Feb. 27th from 1:00PM to 3:30PM at 901 N. Milton Ave. This event is open to the public. Tickets will be $15 at the door and include chili samples, snacks, and beverages. Raffle tickets will be sold at the door for $5 or inside for $7. Kids twelve and under are free.

So come on out and support this great cause and have and sample some warm, comforting chili as we ring out February and get ready for warmer days ahead!

Tuesday's Tips

type="html">
Photo courtesy of  http://www.barbecue-party.com
Today's Tuesday - so here's a tip for you. Keep your grill clean. Nothing messes up a good grilling session than a dirty grill. Burnt on food can turn rancid, and scrapping it into your new fire causes an acrid smoke flavor. It can get even worse on a low slow cook of barbecue. Ever bite into a succulent juicy rib, only to be immediately repulsed by the flavor of dirty smoke?  Keep it clean Joe.

PS. I was part of a team of elite foodies and a barbecue legendess (She's like a princess with her pedigree!) who took part in a super secret pork rib-off of Manhattan's barbecue restaurants yesterday ins a super secret location.. The very surprising results will be posted soon.

PPS - To all my loyal Jewish friends and readers - Happy Pasach! And sorry for the post about pork. My bad.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Google Art Tour

type='html'>
THIS IS A MUST SEE FOR ART TEACHERS.
Google has created an amazing program which allows you to tour many great museums: zoom in to see incredible details, interact, save favorite works, etc.

Thank you Google!

1820's Basic Cotton Day Dress

type='html'>

October 22, 2009

Since finishing my corded stay (which ended up being not corded!) I decided to go into making a gown to wear over it right away rather than working on additional sets of undergarments. That way I can refine the fit and once I have a good basic bodice pattern to work from I can pretty much create limitless variations!

That being decided, I had a terribly hard time deciding what would be a good basic pattern to start with. There are so many styles in the 1820's that you can go with. Round high necklines, shallower necklines, wide scoop necklines, squared necklines, gathered necklines, V shaped necklines both steep and shallow. . .so it was difficult deciding on an overall representative style.

In the end, I chose this. The sketch is bad, but it was a quicky drawing after a whole morning of laborious thought for me to go off of and reference as I made my pattern and mock ups. It has a shallow scoop neckline because that is an oft seen style in the 20's and is also more flattering to me than other styles. It has a front opening because I need nursing access and I didn't want to make a seperate nursing panel. (Most dresses from this period I have seen pictures of open in the back). The lining will be darted to fit and the outer layer will be gathered over the fitted lining. It has moderate size gigot sleeves. (Is there a different name for moderate size gigot sleeves??) I don't need huge sleeves and besides taking more fabric I think the bigger sleeves look ridiculous! I am comfortable with this size but would not go any bigger. At least theoretically on paper. It will have a waistband which will open to a dogleg closure and the skirt will be 3 panels of fabric gathered or gauged to the waistband. The skirt hem is to end just above the ankle, a good "active style" length.

To start with, I tried on my 1820's style dress from last year over my stays to see if I would have to make adjustments to the pattern. I decided I wanted a slightly lower waistline (last years dress was made to go over short stays) and I needed a tad extra width across the bust. I also wanted curved back seams instead of the more straight diagonal seams I used last year. Curved seams are just prettier. :) I made the modifications to my paper pattern and traced it out new. I went through 3 mockups before getting the fit I wanted. I had to lengthen the waistline, try on the mock up, pleat the front excess at the waist, tie an elastic cord around my waist where I wanted the waistline to sit, mark it on the mock up (while it was on me. That was interesting.) I also had to refine the armscye curve and take some excess fabric out of the shoulder seam. I measured my arm and using the Sense and Sensibility Spencer pattern and Janet Arnold as a guide, made a draft for my sleeve. Once all that was done I ended up with these pieces: (my main pattern pieces are for a round high neckline. It is much easier for me to cut a new shallower neckline if desired than to raise a shallow neckline to a high one if I need to).
Then it was time to decide what fabric to use. I decided to use this pretty cream and pink cotton print that David gave me for Christmas last year. It is not exactly historically accurate but it is pretty. He will be pleased I am finally using it. I first tore 3 panels for the skirt, full width and 38" long. I then tore a strip full width and 2.5" wide for the waistband. I then folded the width in half lengthwise and positioned my bodice pieces on it and cut them out.

I ran into a snag with the sleeves. I didn't have quite enough yardage left to cut both sleeves on the fold. I at last decided to fold each selvedge edge in to the center line of the fabric width. Then I placed the sleeve on the fold. Part of the sleeve head did not fit, so I folded it out of the way and cut out what I could.
After I cut both sleeves, I cut off the little folded piece and added 1" allowance to the cut edge. I cut four of these pieces from scrap. They will be sewn to the sleeves to get the finished shape and I don't think the seams will be very noticeable. This method allowed me to get both sleeves from 31" of fabric - half of what it would have taken if I had folded the fabric lengthwise and cut both sleeves on the fold that way! Out of the remaining 1/3 yard of fabric I cut a multitude of bias strips for piping. I plan to pipe all the bodice seams, the waistband and the sleeve seams.

Then, I cut out lining pieces for the bodice from strong white cotton. I don't know if I will line the sleeves or not but I think not. . .they are so large anyway (compared to what I normally make) I think extra fabric would end up weighing them down. On the other hand, something light yet firm would help give the sleeves more shape, especially in the head. But I don't have anything light and firm like that so for now, I think I will leave the sleeves unlined.

Finally, I cut out the new, shallower neckline on all the bodice front and back pieces. I threaded the machine and laid everything out so whenever I get the chance I can start sewing the bodice pieces together!

Love,

Sarah

October 23, 2009

Yesterday afternoon I was able to start sewing the bodice together and was able to get all the main pieces put together and the piping added around the neckline for a finish. I piped each seam on the bodice; the back to side back seams, the side to front seams, and the shoulder seams. I use Peaches n' Cream cotton cord for my piping. For some reason the piping on my last years 1820's dress looks huge to me now. My goal is to get as teeny a pipe as I can. On the few original garments I've actually seen in person, the piping was so small as to be astonishing. It looked almost like a teeny bitty fold of fabric, so much different than the modern day clunky chunky piping you can buy pre made at the fabric store!

So anyway, I piped the bodice. I piped down the center front openings because it gives added strength to that area and on some original gowns with 2 piece fronts (even though they open in the back) the center seam is piped. I like piping; it gives such a neat clean finish and is so quick to do. I turned the raw edges of the piping under and slip stitched them to the dress lining to finish everything off.
This morning I tried the bodice on inside out and pinned it shut down the front. I took up darts in the lining fabric only and pinned them in place. Most original gowns I've seen have only one dart on each side of the front but I had so much extra fabric at the waist, I really had to make two darts on each side to get the right contour to the bust and for everything to lay nicely. *Note: It is usually not recommended that you pin in darts with your inside out bodice on you. This is because when you turn your bodice right sides out, the side you fitted to, for example, your left bust, will now be on your right bust, and vice versa. If your body is noticeably different on either side, it is highly recommened that you make all darts in a muslin and transfer the muslin to paper, clearly marking "left" and "right" so your final product will fit correctly. I hate bothering with this so I never do it. But for those of you who want to take the time to fit something perfectly, this is what is suggested to do.Once the darts were pinned I sewed them in place. Then I gathered the outer fabric down over the darts, and sewed on the waistband. I left 1/2" extending on either edge - the cut edge of the waistband is not flush with the finished bodice edge. This is so later I can turn it to the inside and cover it with the inner waistband.

I then turned my attention to the sleeves. I was pretty excited about them since last year I tried to make this sleeve style and it failed since I did not give myself enough length in the sleeve head. This time, I made sure to add plenty of length! :) Since the sleeve is fitted at the wrist I wanted a short placket so I could easily get my hand through. I sewed piping to the sleeve down the seam on one side, across the bottom and up a few inches on the other side, tapering the piping out to the raw edge. Then, when I sewed the sleeve seam I stopped the stitch line just below where I stopped the piping. The sleeves were turned inside out and the raw edges of the piping turned under and pinned to the lining along the bottom of the sleeve and up the sides of the short placket. A tidy way to do a placket and hem, all at once, and very fast and easy. I will sew a hook and eye to the wrists when I finish the dress.
I was getting a little tired of working on the dress by this time but thought I should at least pipe the armscyes on the bodice, so I did. I then ran gathering stitches across the tops of the sleeves and drew them up. And that was all I cared to do at the time. Next up is sewing the sleeves into the bodice and then turning my thoughts to the skirt. . .
Love,

Sarah ~ who is starting to have a most terrible and untimely fascination with 1810's fashions instead of the 1820's. . .

October 25, 2009

Yesterday I had a little time in the morning to work on the dress so I sewed in the sleeves, trimmed the allowance and considered it good. On historical dresses, many times the sleeve seam does not match the side seam like modern garments. The sleeve seam often is meant to run down the inside of the arm so it is matched to a place on the front bodice, usually at or just below the bust line. I don't have a set, mathematical method for positioning the sleeve seam. What I do is put on the sleeveless bodice, pin it shut, and pull up the sleeve on my arm. I adjust it til I like how it looks and where the seam lies and then I mark the position of the sleeve seam with a pin, on the front bodice. Then when I go to sew the sleeve in I just match the seam to the pin-point.

I don't know what kind of seam finishes were commonly used for dresses of the 1820's. It seems in pictures of original dresses the seams of sturdy fabric are left raw. Since my fabric is pretty sturdy, I just left the seams raw as well. For my 1860's style dresses I know seams were often not finished and if they were, a largish overcast stitch was used or, for underwear, the seams could be run and fell. Sometimes seam binding was used. I like ease, so I just left the seams raw. Later, if I notice them fraying a lot (on past dresses I've made this way the seams just soften up with washing) I can overcast them by hand.

Once the sleeves were in I decided to work on the skirt. I seamed the 3 panels of fabric together, using the selvedge edge in the skirt seams as a natural seam finish. One of the seams I left open for a few inches at the top. I turned under, pressed and handstitched the allowances on each side to finish off the placket.

Then, to make the dogleg closure, I sewed an extended waistband onto one side of the waistband. This band extends 5.5" from the bodice front edge. On the opposite bodice front edge, I marked 5" from the center front.

I gathered the skirt panels by machine (2 rows of the biggest stitch my machine makes) and drew up the panels. I started pinning the skirt to the bodice along the extended waistband, making sure the waistband extended 1/2" from the finished placket edge of the skirt. I pinned the skirt all around, stopping at the point 5" from the edge of the opposite bodice front. This is how it looked once it was sewn to the bodice:
To close, the skirt is first fastened and the bodice then lapped and fastened. This is how it will look when it is shut: I then tore a scrap of white cotton into a strip 2.5" wide and about 34" long to use as the waistband facing. I pressed under 1/2" on all raw edges and laid it wrong side down over the waistband on the inside of the dress. I pinned it to the seam lines, enclosing the seam allowances. Here, it is just pinned but since this time I have slip stitched most of the waistband facing to the waistband. Then to get an idea of what the dress will look like when it is finished, I put it on my homemade dressform (who is in urgent need of re-shaping and re-stuffing) and pinned it shut. I'm happy with how it looks so far! The skirt is gathered in the front just under the bust gathers per an original dress I've seen photos of (I have pics of the original dress on my Sangamon Settler blog, if anyone wants to see it - it is lovely!) The sides of the skirt are ungathered for a few inches on each side and the back is very tightly gathered. Now I must finish attaching the waistband facing and make the hem and the dress is ready for fasteners! :)

Love,

Sarah

October 28, 2009

It's been a few days since I've posted, but a few days ago I finished the hem. The hem was done in this manner:

3 strips of white cotton about 4" wide were torn full width and sewn together into a tube, equaling the circumference of the skirt. The white cotton facing was sewn to the skirt, right sides together, all along the bottom edge of the skirt. The seam was pressed towards the facing and 1/4" was turned under along the raw facing edge, towards the inside:
Then, the facing was pressed up inside the skirt and pinned in place. A teeny bit of skirt fabric was turned under as well, just so there is no danger of the white facing showing from the outside! :) I used a running stitch with small stitches on the outside and larger ones on the inside to attach the facing by hand. This is a quick and easy way to do a hem and can be done on any rectangular skirt. The hem facing will also take the abuse of wear and can be replaced once it gets dingy and dirty (I have done this before!) thus protecting the dress fabric from getting tatty at the hem prematurely.

I still have to sew hooks to the bodice (I already sewed them to the dogleg closure) but I need 10 and only have 5 on hand so I need to pick up some more packages of them. I won't be going to town until tomorrow, but perhaps I can take some hooks off an old dress so I can finally wear this one.

Love,

Sarah

December 4, 2009

I have had this dress finished for over a month but have procrastinated posting pictures of it here until now. These were taken at the beginning of November outside of our house; the last warm days of fall! Now that it is finished I think it looks more late 1820's/early 1830's due to the height of the waist, the full skirts and the size of the sleeves. It's still an 1820's dress, just not as early a style as I had originally been going for. :) But I really like it anyway, I think it is my new favorite gown.


War Geology

In the year 1915 the Great War reached the, at the time, Austrian Dolomites as the neutral Italy declared war to the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. The military high commando feared that bypassing the Alps the Italian army could reach the city of Vienna in just one week, so it was decided to secure the most important routes and mountain passes at the national borders.

The Falzarego pass, connecting the city of Cortina d´Ampezzo with the
western valleys, was of strategic significance - this pass is situated at 2.105m a.s.l. and is dominated in the north by the nearly vertical cliff of the small Lagazuoi, a 2.700m high mountain.

Fig.1. The Lagazuoi overlooking the Falzarego pass situated at the left corner of the photography. The Austrian front line followed the crest of the mountain.

There was
no experience with war in such an extreme and alpine environment, it was nearly impossible to attack directly the enemy when he hid behind inaccessible rocks or in steep cliffs and soon a position warfare between the Austrian and Italian troops developed.
The strategists of the military tried to resolve this problem with a war technology successfully adopted in the soft shale, cretaceous sediments and quaternary depos
its of the low plains of France, Netherlands or Russia: the mine war. Long tunnels were dig until approaching hidden in the underground the enemy front line, then the end of the tunnel is filled with explosives or mines and the enemy simply blasted away.
In mountains by undermining the enemy position or by causing rock-fall on the enemy it was possible to misuse the geology as tactical weapon of mass destruc
tion. However the Triassic rocks of the Dolomites were much harder to excavate than expected and only with great effort in material and men it was possible to extend the military tunnels by 10m every day in the dolostone.

In the years 1915 to 1917, when the
war in the Dolomites was finally abandoned, at the entire front line of Tyrol 34 blasting operations were attempted, 20 by the Italian army and the remaining by the Austrian army.
The Austrian army realized the importance to know the geology of the battle fiels and instituted a special division formed by war-geologists - the "K
riegsgeologen". These geologists recorded the geology in the front line and studied the best solutions for engineering problems to construct defensive positions, artificial tunnels and other military infrastructures. Apart their military duties they however enjoyed great liberties and were allowed to move free at the front line and to continue their scientific work by collecting samples, rocks and fossils. Also in the Italian army many professional geologists were engaged, even if the Italians never possessed an own military geologists-division.

Fig.2. A romantic view of the war in the Dolomites as seen by the Austrian artist and alpinist Gustav Jahn (1879-1919), who fought in the first world war. Soon the soldiers realized that this war would last much longer than expected and that the beautiful landscape hid a harsh mountain environment that would cost more lifes than the battle operations.

The Lagazuoi is composed of the Cassian Dolomite-formation, dolostone of a former Triassic reef complex with the massif reef core at its centre and the clinostratification of reef debris interfingering with marls of a sea basin to the east. The dolostone of this formation is hard but brittle and also tectonically weakened, so driving small tunnels into the mountain is still possible, even if a tedious quest.
In 1915, to reach the Italian position situated in middle of the southern rock wall of the Lagazuoi, the Austrian army begun to excavate from the northern slope a tunnel trough the mountain. Adopting a similar strategy the Italian soldiers tried to undermine the peak of the Lagazuoi, where the Austrian soldiers were stationed, so the Italian excavated in five months a more than 1.000m long tunnel to reach a position below the mountain peak.

The Austrian Kaiserjäger Hanz Berger remembers the work in the tunnels:


"In the tunnels I'm afraid to be blasted into the air from below or to
become entrapped, the pointers of my clock seem to slow down in this place, a second lasts for two, a minute for 20 minutes, a night can last forever and it seems that the sun is gone forever."

Fig.3. The Austrian front line follows a rock wall on the summit of the Lagazoui - today the huts and the tunnels used by the soldiers are a memorial place.

Fig.4. A simple hut constructed by the soldiers.

Fig.5. Inside the hut, the soldiers lived for months, often the entire winter, in such primitive shelters.

Fig.6. View outside one of the tunnels through a loophole into the valley.

At the Lagazuoi many tunnels were constructed and 5 mines were detonated by the two armies during the war:


Shortly after midnight of the new-year day of 1916 the Austrian army initiated the mine wars at the Dolomites front with the detonation of 300kg of explosives inside of the Lagazoui. A large boulder was blasted off but it caused only minor damage on the huts of the Italia
n position.

On 11.07.1916 the Italian army blasts off the "Castelletto", a rock ledge on the steep cliff of the Tofana di Roces, a mountain situated in the east to the Lagazuoi, using 35.000kg of
explosives hidden in a 400m long gallery inside the mountain. They hope to bury and destroy the underlying Austrian front line, 13 soldiers were killed.

Fig.7. The Tofane di Roces today.

On 14.01.1917 using 16.000kg of explosives a 37m in diameter and 45 deep crater was blasted into the mountain, still today the debris of the explosion is recognizable at the base of the cliff of the Lagazuoi (left debris cone).


22.05.1917 the third Austrian blast operation with 30.400kg explosives tries to destroy the Italian position, 200.000 cubic meters debris fell off from the mountai
n producing a 200 high and 140m broad scar, 4 Italian soldiers were killed.

In the morning of the 20, June 1917, after the construction of a complex gallery trough the mountain, 33.000kg of explosives deposited under the peak of the Lagazuoi explode, tearing apart the mountain and producing the right debris cone at the base of the Lagazuoi.

Fig.8. The scar in the rock wall and the debris cone produced from the explosion in 1917 is still well visible. The Italian front line was situated in the middle of the rock wall, on the large step visible in the photography, formed by the contact of two stages of the reef-growth during the Triassic.

The Italian soldier Luigi Panicalli recalls this day:


"I realize that in few moments the results of all this months, in which we worked and suffered, will be shown. I'm like petrified. In this last moments my thoughts are by the enemy - poor guys - do they feel that death is approaching, do they anticipate that their enemy is inside the mountain and will hurl them from the summit of the mountain into the grave ?"

In the end the various attempts and operations in all these years didn't change the front line or the progress of the war - and still today the scars of the mountain are visible like silent reminders of the madness of war.



Bibliography:


AVANZINI, M. & ZAMBOTTO, P. (2009): Paleontologi in Guerra. PaleoItalia 20: 17-20

PIERO, G.; AVANZINI, M.; BREDA, A.; KUSTATSCHER, E.; PRETO, N.; ROGHI, G.; FURIN, S.; MASSARI, F. PICOTTI, V. & STEFANI, M. (2010): Dolomites 7th international Triassic Field Workshop Pan-European correlation of the Triassic. Field trip to the world heritage site of the Tethyan Triassic September 5-10, 2010 Dolomites, Southern Alps, Italy: 122

Online Resources:


KNOPP, G. (2009): Der Kampf um Südtirol. (Accessed 11.05.2011)
STRIFFLER, R. (): Die 34 Minensprengungen an der Tiroler Gebirgsfront 1916-1918. (Accessed 11.05.2011)